• thynne-macartney-logo
  • Expertise
  • People
  • About Us
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Pay Invoice

Tales from the crypt: Estate planning for cryptocurrency

14 July 2021

In the early years of cryptocurrency emergence, whether or not cryptocurrency was “property”, capable of being bought, sold, and bequeathed in a Will, was uncertain.

The mist now appears to have cleared, helped by a decision last year of the High Court in New Zealand.1 There now seems to be no dispute that cryptocurrency is “property” in the legal sense.

Cryptocurrency is intangible – it does not physically exist anywhere. Generally speaking, ownership is proved by the possession of one or more “keys” – if you have the keys, you “own” the cryptocurrency, and can sell it for conventional money. There is no central register of ownership as there is for land, vehicles or shares. Clearly, if the keys fall into the wrong hands, theft is possible.

But a related risk arises when cryptocurrency forms part of an estate – if the executor or personal representative is not placed in possession of the keys, the risk is real that no one will ever be able to access or benefit from the asset. If the keys are lost, the asset is lost.

Online searches will highlight some spectacular losses in the order of hundreds of millions of dollars resulting from unavailable keys, including Bitcoin’s enigmatic, vanished creator Satoshi Nakamoto who is reported to have lost Bitcoins worth billions.

There are a wide range of methods available for storing keys, which are designed to reduce the risk of asset loss while still maintaining security. These include:

  • hot wallet – keys stored online with a third party (e.g. Coinbase);
  • cold wallet – such as the keys written on a piece of paper and stored on a physical file;
  • bank – as above, but the paper is stored in a safety deposit box known to the executor; and
  • measures provided by the cryptocurrency itself – for example, bitcoin offers such options as a “dead man’s switch” where keys are sent to a nominated person if proof of life is not provided at agreed intervals.

That being said, it is inadvisable to put the actual keys in the Will. If probate is obtained, the Will becomes a public document which can be viewed by anyone on payment of a fee. This could allow the keys to fall into the wrong hands.

Thynne + Macartney is experienced in dealing with issues specific to cryptocurrency that should be considered carefully as part of your succession planning.

 

cryptocurrency-on-the-phone

 


 

1  Ruscoe v Cryptopia Limited (in liquidation) [2020] NZHC 728.

 

Author: Nick Knowlman (Lawyer)

News & Insights

Best Lawyers Australia recognises Michael Fisher, Matthew Hockaday and Alex Ramsey as Lawyers of the Year

Best Lawyers Australia recognises Michael Fisher, Matthew Hockaday and Alex Ramsey as Lawyers of the Year

Read More
Nuclear spring causes fission in Callide

Nuclear spring causes fission in Callide

Read More
Mining lease objections review

Mining lease objections review

Read More
Biosecurity management plans: free pass for resource companies

Biosecurity management plans: free pass for resource companies

Read More

Stay updated

Get the latest news straight to your inbox

Subscribe to receive the latest updates from us!

Pick the area or areas of law that interest you.

Subscribe

Contact Us

  • 07 3231 8888
  • 07 3229 0855
  • mail@thymac.com.au
      • linkedin-logo

 

Liability limited by a scheme approved
under professional standards legislation.

Brisbane Office
  • Level 32, Riverside Centre
    123 Eagle Street
    BRISBANE QLD 4000
Cairns Office
  • Level 1, Moresby Haus
    4 Scott Street
    CAIRNS QLD 4870

  • 07 3231 8888
  • 07 3229 0855
  • mail@thymac.com.au
      • linkedin-logo

 

Liability limited by a scheme approved
under professional standards legislation.

  • © Thynne + Macartney 2025
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy