• thynne-macartney-logo
  • Expertise
  • People
  • About Us
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Dye & Durham Refund
  • Pay Invoice

Don’t fence me in: can an agreement with a former neighbour be enforced on a new owner?

29 August 2024

Agreements such as water agreements, agistment agreements and fencing agreements are common between neighbouring landowners. The question is, just how enforceable are these agreements when one neighbour sells?

This question was recently considered by the Queensland Court of Appeal in Bellevue Station Pty Ltd v Consolidated Pastoral Company Pty Ltd.

The Facts
“Wrotham Park” and “Bellevue Station” are adjoining cattle stations in Northern Queensland. Due to the physical attributes of the properties, fencing on the legal boundary is difficult. To overcome this, the owners of the properties signed a ‘give and take’ agreement under which each party was permitted to access part of the other party’s property that fell either side of the natural boundary.

A clause of the agreement provided that if either party sold their property, the incoming purchaser must enter into a similar agreement with the continuing property owner.

When the owner of “Bellevue Station” sold the property, the owner of “Wrotham Park” refused to enter into an agreement with the incoming owner and sought instead to construct a fence along the legal boundary between the properties.

The question for the court was whether the new owner of “Bellevue Station” could force the continuing owner of “Wrotham Park” to sign a replacement give and take agreement.

The Queensland Court of Appeal found that the owner of “Wrotham Park” could refuse to enter into a replacement agreement as there was no implied obligation on it to continue the arrangement with the incoming owner of “Bellevue Station”. The Court went on to say that even if there was an implied obligation, the phrase “enter into a similar arrangement” was too uncertain to be enforceable.

Implications

The decision highlights the importance of the language used in these types of agreements. Neighbours making such agreements should carefully consider who is to be bound to continue the arrangement if either or both properties are sold.

Prospective purchasers of properties the subject of agreements with neighbours should also be careful to understand their rights and obligations.

This information is intended to provide a general summary only and should not be relied on as a substitute for legal advice.

About the Authors

Alex Ramsey
Alex Ramsey
Partner Ph: +61 7 3231 8833 Email: aramsey@thymac.com.au
Ari McCamley
Ari McCamley
Partner Ph: +61 7 3231 8878 Email: amccamley@thymac.com.au

News & Insights

Best Lawyers Australia recognises Michael Fisher, Matthew Hockaday and Alex Ramsey as Lawyers of the Year

Best Lawyers Australia recognises Michael Fisher, Matthew Hockaday and Alex Ramsey as Lawyers of the Year

Read More
Nuclear spring causes fission in Callide

Nuclear spring causes fission in Callide

Read More
Mining lease objections review

Mining lease objections review

Read More
Biosecurity management plans: free pass for resource companies

Biosecurity management plans: free pass for resource companies

Read More

Contact Us

  • 07 3231 8888
  • 07 3229 0855
  • mail@thymac.com.au
      • linkedin-logo

 

Liability limited by a scheme approved
under professional standards legislation.

Brisbane Office
  • Level 32, Riverside Centre
    123 Eagle Street
    BRISBANE QLD 4000
Cairns Office
  • Level 1, Moresby Haus
    4 Scott Street
    CAIRNS QLD 4870
Toowoomba Office
  • Mill Street Chambers
    142 Campbell Street
    TOOWOOMBA QLD 4350

  • 07 3231 8888
  • 07 3229 0855
  • mail@thymac.com.au
      • linkedin-logo

 

Liability limited by a scheme approved
under professional standards legislation.

  • © Thynne + Macartney 2025
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy